CCP Virus

An arduous consensus is taking root- the push for over the counter availability of HCQ in New Zealand

Author JJF (English), Tex Hill (Chinese)〈Himalaya New Zealand 〉

On the 19th of September, New Zealand’s largest local media, the New Zealand Herald published an Australian article regarding a double-blind experiment of hydroxychloroquine sulfate titled “Covid 19 coronavirus: Hydroxychloroquine: The drug that could be our saviour”.  For many local supporters of the whistle-blower movement, this was a pleasant surprise. Although the article was simply a reprint, the act of publishing the report itself is telling. We must acknowledge the promotional efforts made by all our supporters.

The reporting by local media regarding the truth of Covid-19 including HCQ has been extremely limited. What little is reported has been overwhelmingly negative. The New Zealand government allocated funds in April of this year to conduct research on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine and several other drugs in the treatment of the CCP virus. However, this effort was terminated within weeks supposedly due to a lack of positive case numbers in New Zealand. It is clear that the narrative effectively mirrors that of the World Health Organization (WHO).  Since then, HCQ has rarely been mentioned in New Zealand’s mainstream media. Even conducting a generic search for  ‘hydroxychloroquine’ as a keyword on government agency websites including the Ministry of Health and Parliament yield zero results.  ······ [Read more] “An arduous consensus is taking root- the push for over the counter availability of HCQ in New Zealand”

The scientific report

Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route

Yan, Li-MengKang, ShuGuan, JieHu, Shanchang

 

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has led to over 910,000 deaths worldwide and unprecedented decimation of the global economy. Despite its tremendous impact, the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has remained mysterious and controversial. The natural origin theory, although widely accepted, lacks substantial support. The alternative theory that the virus may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into the relevant research laboratories.

  ······ [Read more] “The scientific report”

Chinese virologist: China’s government ‘intentionally’ released COVID-19

Chinese virologist--Dr. Li meng Yan :“I work[ed] in the WHO reference lab, which is the top coronavirus lab in the world'

The Chinese government intentionally manufactured and released the COVID-19 virus that led to mass shutdowns and deaths across the world, a top virologist and whistleblower told Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday.

Carlson specifically asked Dr. Li-Meng Yan whether she believed the Chinese Communist Party released the virus “on purpose.” “Yes, of course, it’s intentionally,” she responded on “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

Yan said more evidence would be released but pointed to her own high-ranking position at a World Health Organization reference lab as a reason to trust her allegation.

“I work[ed] in the WHO reference lab, which is the top coronavirus lab in the world, in the University of Hong Kong. And the thing is I get deeply into such investigation in secret from the early beginning of this outbreak. I had my intelligence because I also get my own unit network in China, involved [in] the hospital … also I work with the top corona[virus] virologist in the world,” she said.

EXCLUSIVE: CHINESE VIROLOGIST ACCUSES BEIJING OF CORONAVIRUS COVER-UP, FLEES HONG KONG: I KNOW HOW THEY TREAT WHISTLEBLOWERS’

“So, together with my experience, I can tell you, this is created in the lab … and also, it is spread to the world to make such damage.”

  ······ [Read more] “Chinese virologist: China’s government ‘intentionally’ released COVID-19”

Will the coronavirus become weaker and gradually disappear?

Dr. Yan talks about whether the coronavirus may become weaker and gradually disappear, and how to overcome this virus


Jack:

Dr Yan we have a question from one of our audience members, it’s question number 9 for the avn crew and the question is: since covid 19 is still roaming around the country and not acting like a seasonal flu, does that mean it might be getting weaker and burning itself out? And I think she’s probably referencing perhaps the history of SARS-1 and i wondered if you could talk about that sort of potential decay of the virus?


Dr Yan:

Okay, so first i want to tell our audience that, yes, they have this idea because their idea based on this virus is some virus that comes from nature after the natural evolution, and finally this virus pathogen meets the host here. It means humans because humans are shown to be the best hosts in the world for SARS-CoV-2, but this thing’s based on the law of nature. And here we are talking about something special. We didn’t see this virus on the other natural kind of character like we see before. And according to what I said before, we analyse the genome and we see the evidence this virus actually is definitely not come from nature and it’s already been modified through the lab, those kinds of techniques.   ······ [Read more] “Will the coronavirus become weaker and gradually disappear?”

The Past and Present of HCQ

Written by Gravitational Wave

It is probably the first time in modern history that a kind of medicine is stigmatized as a victim of politic game. Yes, you know what I am going to talk about, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). It is a long story. Please read it patiently, I believe you will come to your own judgment.

Antimalarials have been used as slow-acting drugs to treat rheumatism for more than a century. It originated from the bark of Cinchona tree in Peru. In 1820, two French pharmacists successfully extracted quinine, the earliest antimalarial drug in history, from the bark of cinchona. In 1894, a physician in London, England, used quinine to treat discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) for the first time and achieved remarkable results. This was the first time that scientists used antimalarials to treat immune diseases.

Chloroquine is a chemically synthesized antimalarial drug based on quinine. With the development of science, scientists have discovered that chloroquine has obvious toxic and side effects while exerting therapeutic effects.So, in 1944, scientists developed a new type of antimalarial drug, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), based on chloroquine. The difference between it and chloroquine is that a hydroxyl group is added to chloroquine, which has similar therapeutic effects but significantly reduces side effects.

Since then, hydroxychloroquine has been widely used as an immunosuppressant in the treatment of rheumatic diseases.  ······ [Read more] “The Past and Present of HCQ”